Published: May 2, 2017
HARTFORD, CONN. – HB 6335, a proposed bill that the antiques trade characterized as “the destructive ivory ban,” has died quietly at the close of the state legislature’s session.
“Despite making it through Environment Committee, LCO had some issues with the bill and it was referred to Judiciary. It was not called before the deadline and subsequently expired,” said Mitch Bolinsky, who represents Newtown’s 106th District in the Connecticut General Assembly and had opposed the measure. The Legislative Commissioners’ Office (LCO) provides nonpartisan legal counsel to the members of the Connecticut General Assembly and their staff.
Opponents say HB 6335 would have put the state’s historic artifacts at risk, undermining the ability of Connecticut’s art and history institutions to fulfill their missions and harm struggling small businesses.
HB 6335, An Act Prohibiting the Sale and Trade of Ivory and Rhinoceros Horn in Connecticut, was co-sponsored by Representatives Diana Urban of Stonington and Josh Elliott of Hamden. Its harm to collectors, museums and the antiques trade in the state, according to opponents, stemmed from an arbitrary 20 percent or less restriction and the inclusion of marine mammals in the definition of ivory, such as whale, walrus and narwhal. This, they contended, would create particular harm for Connecticut’s distinguished maritime history. With New London as one of the world’s most important Nineteenth Century whaling centers, countless pieces of scrimshaw and other works of art would be banned and deemed worthless.
“We are grateful to all those who contributed to the defeat of this ivory ban, including the Wadsworth Atheneum, the Mystic Seaport, antiques dealers, collectors and historians,” said Arthur Liverant and Kevin Tulimieri of Nathan Liverant and Son, Colchester, Conn. “We are deeply appreciative to Representative Mitch Bolinsky of Newtown for his tireless and effective opposition. He has been a major force in the effort to defend our state from destructive legislation and protect our shared cultural heritage.”
“Banning, seizing and making family heirlooms, collections and museum pieces from a bygone era valueless would do material harm to law-abiding people, businesses and institutions throughout our state,” said Bolinsky. “HB-6335 was a bad bill that did nothing to solve the problem of poaching modern, illicit ivory. Having raised the same bill for the third time, not having learned from prior defeats and knowingly ignoring a better, more workable solution with bipartisan and community support was just plain poor judgement.
“I do not doubt the proponents will be back with this bad bill next year but, unless the proponents approach the process collaboratively and with consideration, it will fail again.”
April Historic Architecture Tours Resume In Fairfield County
April 19, 2023
What Is Exempt In British Ivory Trade Revealed
April 4, 2023
‘Antiques And The Arts Weekly’ Announces New Co-Publishers
March 28, 2023
5 Church Hill Road / Newtown, CT 06470
Mon - Fri / 8:00 am - 5:01 pm